Non-disclosure Days

It’s not about the files. It’s about the lies.

The big lie is the apex predator of deception. Plausibility is not required. Big lies eat facts for breakfast, logic for lunch, reason for dinner, and truth for desert.

It’s been a year since the JFK file release. It’s been nearly a year since the RFK and MLK file releases. Yet, those conspiracies and others are still officially ignored.

The self-evident, obvious conspiracy explanations have still not been made official. The Warren Report is still the official lie. Sirhan is still falsely imprisoned. The pseudo-debates go on. Official foreign and domestic assassinations, war crimes and other conspiracies continue with impunity. The fallout worsens. Nothing has changed. China, Russia, Cuba and other foreign governments know all of this, of course, and use it to leverage the U.S. These are the consequences of not resolving this assassinocracy.

None of this is a surprise to those who know a simple truth: It’s not about the files. It’s about the lies.

Who killed JFK? In fact, though more minutia can be discovered, down to the Planck scale if you want, we know the answer. We have always known.

Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy knew the moment he got the news. On the evening of the assassination, he called Enrique (Harry) Ruiz-Williams, a Bay of Pigs veteran and his closest contact among the Cuban exiles, and said, “One of your guys did it.” RFK then sent Kennedy family friend William Walton to tell trusted Soviet diplomat Georgi Bolshakov that the Kennedy family believed it was a large political conspiracy.

Gary Underhill also knew. He had known and worked with the conspirators on CIA Operation AM/WORLD. James DiEugenio, in his book, Destiny Betrayed, wrote:

“On that evening of November 22, 1963, Gary Underhill was a deeply troubled man. What he had learned, and the fact that they knew he had learned it, were too much for him. He had to escape. Once he was out of Washington, he could regain his equilibrium. Then he would decide what to do. He had friends in New York he could talk to without fear of the word getting back to Washington.” Underhill left Washington Saturday. Late that evening at the home of friends in New Jersey, Robert and Charlene Fitzsimmons, he told Charlene: “I couldn’t believe they’d got away with it, but they did. They tried it in Cuba, but they couldn't get away with it. After the Bay of Pigs. But Kennedy wouldn’t let them get away with it. He was about to blow the whistle on them…The country is too dangerous for me now. They’ve gone mad. They’re drug runners and gun runners. They get the intelligence and come back and tell the government how to run the country. And they’re lying. And those idiots are listening to it. Kennedy gave them some time after the Bay of Pigs. ‘We’ll give them a chance to save face,’ he said. The CIA is under enough pressure already.”

He further told Charlene Fitsimmons: “This country is too dangerous for me. I’ve got to get on a boat. Oswald is a patsy. They set him up. It’s too much. The bastards have done something outrageous. They’ve killed the president! I’ve been listening and hearing things. I couldn’t believe they’d get away with it, but they did. They’ve gone mad! They’re a bunch of drug runners and gun runners - a real violence group. I know who they are. That’s the problem. They know I know. That’s why I’m here.” (pp. 98-99)

Yet, the resolution is simple. Officially declare the crime. When the conspiracy is declared, the conspirators will appear. If there is no crime, there are no criminals, and if there are no criminals, there is no criminal justice.

Many different judicial actions become necessary and unavoidable when the crime is declared, like charges of obstruction of justice, charges of aiding and abetting, and judicial discovery, including exhumations. But, no crime, no criminals, no judicial action.

In other words, strike the deep state’s Achilles heel, its big lie that Oswald acted alone. If someone, anyone in power, a district attorney, a mayor, an attorney general, a governor, a member of Congress, an executive officer, a judge, or a justice declares the crime a conspiracy, the lie ends. It’s that simple.

The only Texas attorney general to reopen the JFK assassination case (a Texas crime) was Jim Mattox. Mattox had a lifelong interested in the assassination because his mother had worked for Joe Campisi and witnessed Jack Ruby with Lee Harvey Oswald at Campisi’s restaurant.

When Mattox reopened the case, he was quoted telling his mother’s story to the Austin American-Statesman and to Texas Monthly. This was happening when the Oliver Stone film, JFK, was in the works on the heels of the Ricky White headlines.

It was part of Earl Golz’s reporting at the Statesman. One of Golz’s stories from August 1990 read:

“RUBY, OSWALD MEETING

“In another curious twist to the case, Mattox said late Monday he is interested in pursing the White story because he was once told by his mother, a waitress at Campisi’s Egyptian Restaurant in Dallas, that Ruby frequented the restaurant and that she thought she saw Ruby and Oswald eating dinner there together once.

“‘The restaurant owner, the late Joe Campisi, testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1978 that he didn’t see Oswald in his eatery,’ Mattox said.

“Mattox said he believes he has jurisdiction in the case, and he would interview White and his associates ‘to see what they’ve got and let them explain it to me.’

“‘The key to the thing, of course, is, if the FBI acknowledges seeing the diary,’ Mattox said. ‘The only thing to do is to get a look at the diary or acknowledgment (by the FBI) that it existed.’

“‘This is not a solution to the John Kennedy case,’ Fensterwald said after Ricky White told his story. ‘It‘s information we think is important, and we think it’s true. Even if what is said here today checks out, the case is not solved. We still don't know who planned it and paid for it and basically what the shooting was about. The best we can hope for is to get out of this an idea of who the actual assassins were.’

“It may be difficult for Mattox or anybody else to do much with the case without the Roscoe White diary, which disappeared in 1988. The leather bound journal talked about the assassination and the aftermath, said Ricky White, adding that he and his mother read it.

“Roscoe White died of injuries sustained in an explosive fire in 1971. His widow, Geneva, is critically ill and, according to family members, unable to be interviewed.”

United Press International further reported on Friday, August 10, 1990:

JFK center officials ask Mattox to investigate new assasination theory

AUSTIN, Texas (UPI) — Officials with John F. Kennedy assassination research centers Tuesday asked Attorney General Jim Mattox to investigate a new theory that a Dallas police officer killed the president.

The JFK experts who sponsored a news conference Monday for Ricky Don White, a Midland oil equipment salesman who claims his father was involved in the shooting, met with Mattox for much of the afternoon Tuesday.

“Mattox met with them for about three hours. He asked a lot questions. They went over evidence. They discussed evidence,” Mattox spokesman Ron Dusek said.

Mattox told them that he would review the information that they brought to him. They said that they would provide him with some additional information.

Mattox made no commitment, but said that he was interested and would take very close look at the information and then make a decision on whether to pursue it further.

J. Gary Shaw with the JFK Assassination Information Center in Dallas and Bernard Fensterwald, president of the Assassination Archives and Research Center in Washington, took White’s evidence to Mattox in hopes of obtaining a state review into the evidence White claims implicates the CIA in the assassination.

White claims his father, a former Dallas police officer, was one of three U.S. intelligence operatives who killed Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963, as he traveled in a motorcade through downtown Dallas.

White, 29, also said that evidence his late father, Roscoe Anthony White, left behind indicated that presumed Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald never fired a shot. Instead, he said, Oswald was set up to take the blame for the assassination as part of a plot that included the man who killed Oswald on Nov. 24, 1963, Jack Ruby.

Mattox declined to seek a third term to run for the Democratic nomination for governor, which he lost in a runoff to Ann Richards. The next attorney general, Dan Morales, inherited his investigation in January 1991. As the spotlight faded from the Stone film, Morales pulled the attorneys off the case one by one to pursue other cases, including his lawsuits against big tobacco.

Had Jim Mattox simply declared the conspiracy, Dan Morales would not have been able to shut down the state’s judicial action so quietly. That lesson still applies today and to every non-disclosure day to come.